Logic old and new
I’ve been avidly following a debate that has arisen recently over the respective merits of modern symbolic logic versus traditional logic. Peter Kreeft started the whole affair with an article Clashing Symbols The Loss of Aristotelian Logic & the Social, Moral & Sexual Consequences. in Touchstone Magazine.
I haven’t read it yet but between the article’s title and what I’ve read of Kreeft’s book Socratic Logic, I can safely conclude Kreeft is fairly hostile to modern symbolic logic. In response, William Randolph Brafford has published a rejoinder defending symbolic logic which can be found on the First Thoughts Blog.
Personally. I am very sympathetic to both Kreeft’s and Cothran’s positions. I have enjoyed studying traditional logic very much but have found symbolic logic baffling and esoteric. In truth, I just don’t know enough about modern logic to make a qualified judgement on the matter. However, I do plan on reading the books that Cothran mentions in his posts as well as continuing my studies in both branches of logic.